No angel appeared to me to call me to the priesthood, but it has been one of the most fulfilling adventures of my life. My dream is not to save the world. I am seeking only to live my life while serving God and His people in a way that will enable me say to Christ when I see Him one day: “I have fought the good fight; I have finished the race; I have kept the faith.” (2 Timothy 4:7).

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

The 21st Sunday in Ordianry Time, August 26, 2012



Joshua 24:1-2a, 15-17, 18b; Ephesians 5:21-32; John 6:60-69

         
          Today we finish our reflections upon the bread of life discourse. We,  as the disciples before were, are presented with a choice: whether to accept or to reject the offer God has made to us in Jesus. This is a crux, the heart of the whole discourse.
          We accept the God's offer whenever we eat Jesus' body and drink his blood and truly believe we are doing that.
          But what we need to keep in mind is that it is not Jesus' human flesh which we are invited to eat. And indeed it was not his human flesh which Jesus was offering to his disciples in the first place. Rather, we are offered the Spirit-filled flesh and blood of the Son of Man. We are offered the flesh of the one in whom the Spirit of God dwelled and still dwells, whose words expressed and still express the life giving Spirit of God. We are offered the body and blood of the incarnate God.
          Unless we believe in it,  it is useless for any of us to be a part of the Eucharistic celebration. For it is not rite itself, it is not just bread and wine which somehow magically contain the key to our eternal life, but it is Christ himself thanks to the Spirit of God that offers us the gift of eternal life in his Spirit filled words and under the specious of bread and wine. And as Vatican II Council also added Christ who is also present in the community of believers and in the priest who presides at the Eucharistic table.
          Whenever we meet here to celebrate the Eucharist, as the bread of life discourse place in front of us, we are presented with the choice of accepting or rejecting the offer God has made to us in Jesus.
          And the way we live our lives shows that choice. It shows if we, as St. Paul in his writings notices, consume the body and blood of the incarnate God here for a purpose of our salvation when we follow Christ's teachings or a purpose of our condemnation when our lives do not reflect the values of his gospel.

Sunday, August 19, 2012

The 20th Sunday of Ordinary Time, August 29, 2012



Proverbs 9:1-6; Ephesians 5:15-20; John 6:51-58

          It is important to remember, as we read the bread of  life discourse and attempt to interpret it, that that all the words which Jesus speaks in this discourse belong to a particular occasion. He speaks to the same people who ate his miraculous gift of bread and fish. His words offer them an interpretation of that miracle for the miracle in itself was not enough for them to have faith in him.

          And his words are very clear:

He is that true bread they have to eat in order to live.
He is that ultimate and definitive point of access to God (not the Law of Moses as, in his commentary on this discourse Joseph Ratzinger notices).

          (Of course as we read the gospel according to John, we quickly notice that Jesus can be met not only as the bread of life but also, for example, as the presence of God (6:20). For the Fourth Evangelist there is more than one way of encountering Christ potentially making Jesus the center of the  believer's life and enabling him or her to develop a deep relationship with him. The Fourth Evangelist does not draw a line of demarcation between participation in the eucharist and the faith that many Catholics and Protestants seem to draw.)

          It is also worth of noticing that this particular point of access to God, presented to us in chapter 6th of John's gospel,  is not revealed to people through a "spiritual" gift, but through a tangible, physical gift, through an ordinary experience of eating. Jesus' gift of food, the offer of his grace, provided the crowd with a glimpse of his identity, but they were not able to understand this sign. They immediately tried to twist Jesus' identity to serve their own purposes. They wanted to make him a king. They wanted to take his grace and twist it to conform to pre-existent systems of power and authority. This is why Jesus tries to explain to them what truly happened. This is what the bread of life discourse is about.
          There is a danger for any institution or as a matter of fact for each one of us to do exactly what the multitudes from the chapter 6th of St. John's gospel did. To twist and abuse the true identity of Jesus for a purpose of personal or institutional gains. This is why I believe it is good, from time to time,  to look at what the Johannine eucharistic theology offers our contemporary church. So what does it offer?

          DISCLAIMER:
          PLEASE, I ASK YOU AT THIS POINT TO REMEMBER WHAT I WAS SAYING FOR THE LAST SEVERAL WEEKS. THIS PART OF THE REFLECTIONS HAS TO BE BALANCED WITH MY LAST WEEKS HOMILY WHERE I OUTLINED THE PRESENT TEACHING OF THE CHURCH REGARDING THE EUCHARIST CONTAINED IN THE CANON LAW OF THE CHURCH!!! TODAY I AM LOOKING ONLY AT A VERY BASIC BIBLICAL ANALYSIS OF BREAD OF LIFE DISCOURSE WITHOUT ANY ADDITONAL HISTORICAL AND THEOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT REGARDING CHAPTER 6 OF THE SAINT JOHN'S GOSPEL, OF COURSE AS MUCH AS IT IS POSSIBLE. FOR CLARITY PURPOSES YOU CAN CHECK MY BLOG TO COMPARE LAST'S WEEK'S REFLECTIONS WITH THIS WEEK'S REFLECTIONS.

          So what does the Johannine eucharistic theology offers us?

          First, no church body can claim exclusive rights of Jesus' flesh and blood, because they are Jesus' alone to give.
          In the gospel according to John, Jesus, not his disciples, as it is presented in Synoptic accounts(Matt 14:19; Mark 6:41; Luke 9:16), distributes the bread and fish to the multitudes. It appears that the Fourth Evangelist it is up to Jesus alone to give the eucharist. All of Jesus' life is given to the believer when he or she eats Jesus' flesh and drinks his blood, and no one have  right to control that. The eucharist belongs to the believer, not to the to the church.

          Second, the Johanainne emphasis on the relationship between Jesus and the believer in the eucharist calls the church to ponder the role of the ordained clergy with respect to the eucharist.
          The Johannine eucharistic theology seems to suggest as it was just mentioned that no one other than Jesus can control access to the eucharistic meal. Clergy may be given responsibility to ensure that believers are provided with opportunities to participate in the eucharist, but it is Jesus' presence, not clergy privilege, that governs the eucharist. Thus Johannine eucharistic theology poses some challenge to those churches, Catholic and some Protestant, that elevate the role of the person who presides at the eucharist. By placing the eucharistic theology in the context of the bread of life discourse rather than an institution narrative as found in the Synoptics (Mark, Matthew and Luke gospels), the Fourth Evangelist emphasizes the personal dimension of the sacrament rather than the institutionalization and institutional control of the sacrament. The eucharist is not Jesus' gift to an elite group of twelve who then mediate that gift to others; the eucharist is Jesus' direct gift to those who believe.


          Thus it seems as for the Fourth Evangelist the believer's participation in the eucharist revolves around Jesus' gift and the believer's relationship to Jesus, not on a control or a mediation of that gift by the hierarchical church.

          Finally, there should not be a static division between word and sacrament in the life of the church. Both are needed to see God in Jesus and to believe.
          One must eat the bread, not simply respond to the teachings of Jesus, in order to live. They are both needed and necessary to have life in him.

          It is also worth noticing here that the Johannine eucharistic theology poses some challenge to many Protestant churches which believe that the eucharist is primarily a commemoration of Jesus' death or  a just meal of fellowship. For the Fourth Evangelist, the eucharist is a meal of Jesus' presence. The eucharist is truly feeding on and being fed by Jesus. Any form of "fellowship" of the community derives only from the mutual indwelling of Jesus and the believer. The believer who is fed by Jesus, offered his words, and called by him to a deeper relationship with him.

          I believe that looking at the bread of life discourse and its basic biblical analysis help us to see more clearly how precious and unique gift of God Jesus is. We need to respect and cherish that gift the best possible way. But we can't not control it. It is not our property or an exclusive possession.

          I also believe that this is why the Catholic Church, through the means of the Cannon Law, tries to outline the ways in which this gift is respected and cherished by all humanity.

          But ultimately any institution and any individual have to bow in humility  before the mystery of God's incarnation and the gift of Christ offered to us in the eucharist and word, and to accept this simple truth that it is God who is in charge. It is Him who calls each one of us individually into a relationship with His Son. The Son who is the ultimate point of access to Him for all humanity.

                     

Sunday, August 12, 2012

19th Sunday of Ordianry Time, August 12, 2012



1 Kings 19:4-8; Ephesians 4:30-5:2; John 6:41-51

            Sometimes some of us, after reading the passages of the Holy Scriptures, particularly the New Testament, claim with the utter conviction that at the time of Jesus Judaism was filled with so many laws that it was impossible for an ordinary person to fulfill all the requirements of those laws.
          But the truth to be told, Jewish people had only 613 commandments at that time. They were the statements and principles of law, ethics, and spiritual practice contained in the Torah or Five Books of Moses, the Five First Books of our Old Testament. The 613 commandments were either "positive commandments" to perform an act or "negative commandments" to abstain from certain acts. There were 365 negative commandments, corresponding to the number of days in a solar year, and 248 positive commandments, ascribed to the number of bones and significant organs in the human body.
          In our Catholic Tradition we have developed our own laws directing the live of the Church and her faithful. Those laws are contained in so called the Code of Canon Law. We have almost three times more laws/commandments/canons than the Jewish people of Jesus' times had. We have 1752 canons, and thousands more paragraphs explaining them even in more details.
          As I promised last weekend I would like to look with you, as we continue reading chapter 6 of the gospel according to John, the Bread of Life Discourse, into some of the laws of our church pertaining to the Eucharist. Since we have 62 canons devoted strictly to this subject I am intending to bring to your attention only some of them. From time to time I will provide some further interpretations of particular canons hoping that I am not in any error. If I am in error please let me know so I can make necessary corrections in the next two weeks during my reflection times and on my blog. I am not a Canon Lawyer. As I also mentioned the last week the next weekend we will look closer at the basic biblical interpretations of the Bread of Life Discourse. The interpretations which complement the canons of our church.  

So let us begin:

Can 897-the most August sacrament is the Most Holy Eucharist in which Christ the Lord himself is contained, offered, and received and by which the Church continually lives and grows. The eucharistic sacrifice, the memorial of the death and resurrection of the Lord, in which the sacrifice of the cross is perpetuated through the ages is the summit and source of all worship and Christian life, which signifies and effects the unity of the People of God and brings about the building up of the body of Christ. Indeed, the other sacraments and all the ecclesiastical works of the apostolate are closely connected with the Most Holy Eucharist and ordered to it.
Canon 900-§1. The minister who is able to confect the sacrament of the Eucharist in the person of Christ is a validly ordained priest alone.
Can.  901 A priest is free to apply the Mass for anyone, living or dead.
          It means a Mass may be offered for living or deceased, baptized or non-baptized, sinner or saint.
Can.  905 §1. A priest is not permitted to celebrate the Eucharist more than once a day except in cases where the law permits him to celebrate or concelebrate more than once on the same day.
§2. If there is a shortage of priests, the local ordinary can allow priests to celebrate twice a day for a just cause, or if pastoral necessity requires it, even three times on Sundays and holy days of obligation.
Can.906 Except for a just and reasonable cause, a priest is not to celebrate the Eucharist sacrifice without the participation of at least some member of the faithful.
          In 1992 the Pontifical Council of the Interpretation of Legislative Texts gave an authentic interpretation of another canon, #220, paragraph 2, stating that women and girls could be altar servers at Mass.
Can.  912 Any baptized person not prohibited by law can and must be admitted to holy communion.
          However this canon has to be supplemented by Canon 844.
Can.  844 §1. Catholic ministers administer the sacraments licitly to Catholic members of the Christian faithful alone, who likewise receive them licitly from Catholic ministers alone, without prejudice to the prescripts of §§2, 3, and 4 of this canon, and can. 861, §2.
§2. Whenever necessity requires it or true spiritual advantage suggests it, and provided that danger of error or of indifferentism is avoided, the Christian faithful for whom it is physically or morally impossible to approach a Catholic minister are permitted to receive the sacraments of penance, Eucharist, and anointing of the sick from non-Catholic ministers in whose Churches these sacraments are valid.
          My understanding is that that means the Eastern Churches such as Coptic, Ethopian, Maronite, Syriac, Armenian, Greek Byzentine (22 different churches to be exact) and the Polish National Catholic Church. But does not include Baptist, Methodist, Lutheran, Presbyterians, Anglican, Episcopalian Churches, or any other Protestant Churches or non-denominational churches at this time.
§4. If the danger of death is present or if, in the judgment of the diocesan bishop or conference of bishops, some other grave necessity urges it, Catholic ministers administer these same sacraments licitly also to other Christians not having full communion with the Catholic Church, who cannot approach a minister of their own community and who seek such on their own accord, provided that they manifest Catholic faith in respect to these sacraments and are properly disposed.
Can.  915 Those who have been excommunicated or interdicted after the imposition or declaration of the penalty and others obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion.
          I am pretty sure this is going to be brought on numerous occasions due to the elections coming up this November. Also  my understanding is that whenever this penalty is applied the primacy of individual conscience has to be protected and recognized, and the matters of any scandal have to be seriously taken under consideration.  Canon 916 addresses the issue  who should not receive the communion in more details.
Can.  916 A person who is conscious of grave sin is not to celebrate Mass or receive the body of the Lord without previous sacramental confession unless there is a grave reason and there is no opportunity to confess; in this case the person is to remember the obligation to make an act of perfect contrition which includes the resolution of confessing as soon as possible.
Can.  917 A person who has already received the Most Holy Eucharist can receive it a second time on the same day only within the eucharistic celebration in which the person participates.
Can.  919 §1. A person who is to receive the Most Holy Eucharist is to abstain for at least one hour before holy communion from any food and drink, except for only water and medicine.
          To explain it further, the one-hour fast is computed from the time of the completion of the consumption of food or drink until the reception of communion.
§3. The elderly, the infirm, and those who care for them can receive the Most Holy Eucharist even if they have eaten something within the preceding hour.
Can.  920 §1. After being initiated into the Most Holy Eucharist, each of the faithful is obliged to receive holy communion at least once a year.
§2. This precept must be fulfilled during the Easter season unless it is fulfilled for a just cause at another time during the year.
          The diocese of the United States have an indult which allows the Easter duty to be satisfied from the First Sunday of Lent to Trinity Sunday.
Can.  924 §1. The most holy eucharistic sacrifice must be offered with bread and with wine in which a little water must be mixed.
§2. The bread must be only wheat and recently made so that there is no danger of spoiling.
§3. The wine must be natural from the fruit of the vine and not spoiled.
Can.  927 It is absolutely forbidden, even in extreme urgent necessity, to consecrate one matter without the other or even both outside the Eucharistic celebration.
Can.  931 The celebration and distribution of the Eucharist can be done at any day and hour except those which the liturgical norms exclude.
          The vigil Holy Day or Sunday mass cannot be celebrated earlier than 4 pm. And to be considered the Vigil mass the proper readings and prayers of the day have to be used.
Can.  938 §1. The Most Holy Eucharist is to be reserved habitually in only one tabernacle of a church or oratory.
§2. The tabernacle in which the Most Holy Eucharist is reserved is to be situated in some part of the church or oratory which is distinguished, conspicuous, beautifully decorated, and suitable for prayer.
          Since 1977 it has been a requirement that new churches that are built have only one altar, and the blessed sacrament is not to be reserved on the altar of celebration. The liturgical laws strongly recommend a separate blessed sacrament chapel as the most fitting place for Eucharistic reservation.

           
The Eastern Churches:
I. Alexandrean:
1. Coptic Church (Patriarchate): Cairo, Egypt
2. Ethiopian Catholic Church (Metropolia): Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Eritrea
II. Antiochean or West Syrian:
1. Maronite Church (Patriarchate): Bkerke, Lebanon, Cyprus, Jordan, Israel, Palestinian Authority, Egypt, Syria, Argentina, Brazil, United States, Australia, Canada, Mexico (Never separated: union re-affirmed 1182)
2. Syriac Church (Patriarchate): Beirut, Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Palestinian Authority, Egypt, Sudan, Syria, Turkey, United States and Canada, Venezuela
3. Syro-Malankara Church (Major Archepiscopate): Trivandrum, India, United States
III. Armenian:
1. Armenian Church (Patriarchate): Beirut, Lebanon, Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Syria, Turkey, Jordan, Palestinian Authority, Ukraine, France, Greece, Latin America, Argentina, Romania, United States, Canada, Eastern Europe
IV. Chaldean or East Syrian:
1. Chaldean Church (Patriarchate): Baghdad,  Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Egypt, Syria, Turkey, United States
2. Syro-Malabar Church (Major Archepiscopate): Ernakulam, India, Middle East, Europe, America (Never separated)
V. Byzantine or Constantinopolitan:
1. Albanian Church (Apostolic Administration): Albania
2. Belarusian Church (No established hierarchy at present): Belarus
3. Bulgarian Church (Apostolic Exarchate): Sofia,  Bulgaria
4. Križevci Church (An Eparchy and an Apostolic Exarchate): Križevci, Ruski Krstur, Croatia, Serbia, and Montenegro
5. Greek Byzantine Church (Two Apostolic Exarchates): Athens, Greece, Turkey
6. Hungarian Church (An Eparchy and an Apostolic Exarchate): Nyiregyháza, Hungary
7. Italo-Albanian Church (Two Eparchies and a Territorial Abbacy): Italy (Never separated)
8. Macedonian Church (An Apostolic Exarchate): Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
9. Melkite Greek Church (Patriarchate): Damascus, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Israel, Brazil, United States, Canada, Mexico, Iraq, Egypt and Sudan, Kuwait, Australia, Venezuela, Argentina
10. Romanian Church (Major Archiepiscopate): Blaj,  Romania, United States
11. Russian Church (Two Apostolic Exarchates, at present with no published hierarchs): Russia, China; currently about 20 parishes and communities scattered around the world, including five in Russia itself, answering to bishops of other jurisdictions
12. Ruthenian Church (A sui juris Metropolia, an Eparchy, and an Apostolic Exarchate): Uzhhorod, Pittsburgh, United States, Ukraine, Czech Republic
13. Slovak Church (Metropolia and an eparchy): Prešov, Slovakia, Canada
14. Ukrainian Catholic Church (Major Archiepiscopate): Kiev, Ukraine, Poland, United States, Canada, Great Britain, Australia, Germany and Scandinavia, France, Brazil, Argentina

Sunday, August 5, 2012

The 18th Sunday in Ordinary Time, August 5th, 2012



Exodus 16:2-4,12-15; Ephesians 4:17,20-24; John 6:24-35


          They called him "Rabbi" but refused to be taught.

          They desired bread, but were not interested in the true nourishment he was able to offer them.

          They preferred what is immediate and temporary than what lasts forever.

          They were willing to do God's work but only if Jesus were able to deliver them what they demanded.

          What about us?

          Are we here to learn?
         
          Are we here to be nourished with what Jesus offers us?

          And are we here because we want to do God's work unconditionally?

         


         

         



About Me

Just living my life the best way I know. :)

Followers